Analisis Yuridis Pertimbangan Hakim terhadap Permufakatan Jahat dalam Tindak Pidana Terorisme : Studi Putusan Nomor 535/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Jkt.Tim
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37481/jmh.v6i3.2267Keywords:
Criminal Conspiracy, Terrorism, Judicial Consideration, Evidence, Legal CertaintyAbstract
The application of the criminal conspiracy provision in terrorism cases raises legal issues, particularly concerning the distinction between an agreement to commit a terrorist act and acts that remain at the preparatory stage. This study aims to examine the legal considerations of judges in establishing the element of criminal conspiracy in Decision Number 535/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Jkt.Tim and to assess their conformity with the Indonesian criminal justice system. This study employs normative legal research using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. Primary legal materials consist of Law Number 5 of 2018 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Terrorism, the Criminal Procedure Code, and the relevant court decision, supported by secondary legal materials from legal literature and journals. The findings indicate that the judges established the existence of criminal conspiracy by assessing the defendant's actions as an interconnected series, including the pledge of allegiance, structural involvement in the Islamic State of Indonesia, participation in the REVIDABA Team, and the transfer of a firearm. These facts were assessed in conjunction with the admissible evidence to establish the defendant's intent and concurrence of wills. The judicial considerations are generally consistent with the negative statutory evidentiary system and the presumption of innocence. Nevertheless, Article 15 of Law Number 5 of 2018 requires clearer parameters to distinguish criminal conspiracy from mere preparation, as its current formulation may create legal uncertainty.
References
Akbar, R. N. (2026). Analisis putusan bebas terhadap permufakatan jahat terkait tindak pidana narkotika (Studi Putusan No. 22/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Bjm jo Putusan No. 7563 K/Pid.Sus/2025). Jurnal Hukum, 4, 92-102.
Ambarita, F. P., & Idharudin, T. (2024). Crimes of conspiracy and assistance in terrorism. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 27(1), 44-59.
Boulanger, C. (2020). The comparative sociology of legal doctrine: Thoughts on a research program. German Law Journal, 21(7), 1362-1377.
Dianti, F. (2024). Hukum pembuktian pidana di Indonesia: Perbandingan HIR dan KUHAP. Sinar Grafika.
El Rahman, V. (2020). Dinamika terorisme di Indonesia: Studi tentang lokalisasi ideologi eksternal. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Indonesia (JISI), 1(2), 88-123.
Hamzah, A. (2020). Hukum acara pidana Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Hermanto, B., Aryani, N. M., & Astariyani, N. L. G. (2020). Penegasan kedudukan penjelasan suatu undang-undang: Tafsir Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 17(3), 367-380.
Hiariej, E. O. S. (2022). Teori dan hukum pembuktian. Erlangga.
Hidayat, R., & Arief, B. N. (2020). Kebijakan kriminal dalam penanggulangan tindak pidana terorisme di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 27(2), 237-258.
Indriyanto Seno Adji. (2021). Hukum pidana: Perkembangan dan pembaruan. Diadit Media.
Johnston, M. F., Iqbal, M., & True, J. (2020). The lure of (violent) extremism: Gender constructs in online recruitment and messaging in Indonesia. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 46(4), 1-19.
Marpaung, L. (2021). Proses penanganan perkara pidana. Sinar Grafika.
Negara, T. A. S. (2023). Normative legal research in Indonesia: Its origins and approaches. Audito Comparative Law Journal, 4(1), 1-9.
Pakaya, S., & Hadi, I. (2024). Memahami karakteristik penelitian hukum. Jurnal Hukum Egalitaire, 1(3), 546-562.
Rusbala, F. S., & Tauna. (2023). Terrorisme di Indonesia: Pemufakatan jahat dalam tindak pidana terorisme: Studi Putusan Nomor 351/PID.SUS/2017/PN Jkt.Tim. Morality: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9(2), 238-251.
Santhana Dass, R. A. (2021). The use of family networks in suicide terrorism: A case study of the 2018 Surabaya attacks. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 16(2), 173-191.
Setia Negara, T. A. (2023). Normative legal research in Indonesia: Its origins and approaches. Audito Comparative Law Journal, 4(1), 1-9.
Setiawan, E., & Nachrawi, G. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban hukum bagi pelaku tindak pidana permufakatan jahat untuk melakukan tindak pidana terorisme. IBLAM Law Review, 5(1), 63-75.
Sidharta. (2020). Penalaran hukum dan argumentasi yuridis. Genta Publishing.
Yanova, M. H., Komarudin, P., & Hadi, H. (2023). Metode penelitian hukum: Analisis problematika hukum dengan metode penelitian normatif dan empiris. Badamai Law Journal, 8(2), 1-15.
Zainuddin, M., & Karina, A. D. (2023). Penggunaan metode yuridis normatif dalam membuktikan kebenaran pada penelitian hukum. Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), 114-130.
