Analisis Penjatuhan Pidana Pelayanan Masyarakat terhadap Anak yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum untuk Terwujudnya Tujuan Pemidanaan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37481/jmh.v5i3.1476Keywords:
Juvenile Justice, Community Service, Sentencing Considerations, Restorative Justice, Child OffendersAbstract
The imposition of community service as a conditional punishment for children in conflict with the law is a form of restorative justice aimed at rehabilitation rather than retribution. This study focuses on judicial considerations in sentencing community service for child offenders, specifically in District Court Decision No. 59/Pid.Sus-Anak/2024/PN.Tjk, and whether such punishment aligns with the objectives of criminal sentencing. This research adopts a normative and empirical juridical approach, using legal literature and field interviews with judges, prosecutors, and community counselors as primary sources. Data were analyzed qualitatively. The findings reveal that the judge's decision to impose community service is legally grounded in Article 71(1)(c) of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law (UU SPPA), which permits alternative sanctions for child offenders. Philosophically, the sentence aims to reform and educate the child, while sociologically, the court considers both mitigating and aggravating factors, such as the child’s background, remorse, and potential for rehabilitation. The type of service assigned, such as assisting with administrative tasks at a local government office, reflects efforts to promote social responsibility. Furthermore, the imposed punishment fulfills the objectives outlined in Article 51 of the Indonesian Criminal Code, including deterrence, reintegration, conflict resolution, and community peace. Overall, the use of community service supports a more humanistic, child-centered approach to juvenile justice in Indonesia.
References
Aziz, M. (2021). Pendekatan Empiris dalam Studi Hukum: Penguatan Relevansi Kontekstual dalam Penelitian Hukum. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(1), 65–77.
Darmawan, A., & Arfan, A. (2021). Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Perkara Anak yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion, 9(2), 85–97.
Hartono, A., & Syahputra, R. (2023). Efektivitas Pendekatan Yuridis Normatif-Empiris dalam Penelitian Hukum Kontemporer. Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Sosial, 4(1), 29–43.
Lestari, F. (2020). Model Diversi dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 11(2), 145–160.
Mulyani, S., & Sari, N. (2020). Keadilan Substantif dalam Penanganan Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 11(1), 20–35.
Naim, M., & Rahmadani, A. (2021). Relevansi Teori Pemidanaan dalam Perkara Anak di Indonesia. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(2), 100–113.
Ningsih, S., & Arifin, R. (2019). Pelaksanaan Restorative Justice terhadap Anak yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum. Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 10(1), 87–101.
Nugraha, A., & Fitriani, L. (2022). Konstruksi Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Ilmu Hukum: Tinjauan Teoretis dan Praktis. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Aktual, 6(2), 90–105.
Nugroho, S. H., Riyanto, A., & Maulana, D. (2021). Efektivitas Sanksi Pelayanan Sosial bagi Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 51(1), 33–48.
Nurhidayat, T., Rahmawati, F., & Zakaria, R. (2019). Restorative Justice dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Anak. Jurnal Yustisia, 8(3), 210–225.
Prasetyo, E. W., & Widiastuti, D. (2020). Konsep Perlindungan Hukum Anak dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Fiat Justisia, 14(2), 112–128.
Rahayu, A. M., & Darminto, T. (2023). Evaluasi Restorative Justice dalam Perkara Anak di Pengadilan Negeri. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum, 6(1), 57–71.
Rifai, A. (2020). Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Rinaldi, A., & Sunaryo, H. (2020). Teknik Wawancara dalam Penelitian Empiris Hukum. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 20(2), 114–126.
Setiadi, E. (2021). Paradigma Sosio-Legal dalam Studi Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Sosio-Legal Indonesia, 3(1), 50–66.
Sihombing, D., & Hadisiswoyo, L. (2023). Restorative Justice dalam Pemidanaan Anak: Studi Perbandingan Indonesia dan Belanda. Jurnal Peradilan Anak, 2(1), 1–17.
Simatupang, M. (2022). Alternatif Pemidanaan Anak dan Efektivitasnya dalam Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Ulang. Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia, 18(1), 44–59.
Sutanti, Y. (2021). Perlindungan Anak dalam Perspektif UU SPPA. Jurnal Yuridika, 36(3), 225–240.
Utomo, A. (2023). Restorative Justice dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia: Evaluasi Kritis terhadap UU SPPA. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 20(1), 15–30.
Widhiastuti, R., & Zamzam, F. (2021). Konsep Gabungan dalam Pemidanaan dan Relevansinya terhadap Pelaku Anak. Jurnal Konstitusi dan Hukum Pidana, 5(2), 77–88.
Widodo, T., & Ramadhan, M. (2022). Alternatif Pemidanaan Anak: Studi Terhadap Sanksi Pelayanan Masyarakat. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Kemasyarakatan, 4(2), 180–194.
