Konstruksi Realitas Politik dalam Media Sosial: Studi Perilaku Pemilih di Era Informasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37481/jmh.v5i3.1472Keywords:
Social Media, Political Reality Construction, Voter Behavior, Algorithms, Filter BubbleAbstract
Social media platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube have become central arenas for constructing political perceptions and influencing voter behavior in the digital era. This study addresses the issue of how algorithm-driven content personalization on these platforms shapes political narratives, potentially leading to filter bubbles and echo chambers that reinforce ideological bias and limit political diversity. The objective of this research is to examine the role of social media algorithms, digital political communication strategies, and user interactions in shaping voters’ political understanding and decision-making. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, the study collects data through in-depth interviews, digital content analysis, and observations of user behavior on major social platforms during political campaigns. The theoretical framework is grounded in McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory, Social Construction of Reality, the Public Sphere, Connectivism, and Network Society. Findings indicate that algorithmic filtering significantly influences how users access and interpret political content, contributing to increased polarization. Voters are no longer passive recipients but active participants in shaping and disseminating political discourse. The study highlights that while social media enhances democratic engagement, it also poses challenges such as disinformation, ethical concerns, and the erosion of inclusive political dialogue. These dynamics necessitate stronger digital literacy and regulatory frameworks to safeguard political communication in the digital public sphere.
References
Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research?. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160.
Bennett, W. L., & Pfetsch, B. (2018, updated edition 2019). Rethinking political communication in a time of disrupted public spheres. Journal of Communication, 69(3), 256–263. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz009
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2021). Correction experiences on social media during COVID-19: Acceptance, source, and issue matter. Journal of Communication, 71(3), 234–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab004
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications.
Bruns, A. (2019). Are Filter Bubbles Real? Polity Press.
Chadwick, A., & Dennis, J. (2021). Social Media and the Transformation of Political Communication. In J. Stromer-Galley (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication. Oxford University Press.
Chitra, T., & Musco, C. (2020). Analyzing the impact of algorithmic recommendations on polarization. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 115–126.
Cinelli, M., Morales, G. D. F., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118
Enli, G. (2020). Populist political communication in social media: How politicians use Instagram to engage voters. Social Media + Society, 6(1), 205630511989877. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119898774
Gillespie, T. (2020). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.
Given, L. M. (Ed.). (2019). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. SAGE.
Guess, A., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2020). Exposure to misinformation online reduces trust in media. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 7(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2019.3
Helberger, N., Pierson, J., & Poell, T. (2021). Governing online platforms: From contested to cooperative responsibility. The Information Society, 37(4), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2021.1902386
Lindgren, S. (2020). Data Theory: Interpretive Sociology and Computational Methods. Polity Press.
Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2021). Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee. Association of Internet Researchers.
McCosker, A., & Vivienne, S. (2020). Digital literacy and social media: How individuals navigate platforms in political contexts. Media International Australia, 177(1), 133–145.
Nielsen, R. K., & Ganter, S. A. (2022). The power of platforms: Shaping journalism and public discourse. Journalism Studies, 23(1), 1–18.
Papacharissi, Z. (2019). Publics and Counterpublics: Theorizing Political Agency in Networked Spaces. Communication Theory, 29(3), 320–338.
Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2020). Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice. SAGE Publications.
Rufai, S. R., & Bunce, C. (2020). Influence of TikTok on political discourse among youth voters. Journal of Social Media Studies, 5(2), 143–160.
Schmitt, J. B., Rieger, D., & Ernst, J. (2023). Navigating political echo chambers: The role of interactivity in social media. Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502231156784
Susser, D., Roessler, B., & Nissenbaum, H. (2019). Technology, autonomy, and manipulation. Internet Policy Review, 8(2).
Törnberg, P. (2022). Algorithmic simplification and epistemic fragmentation: How platform logics shape online political discourse. New Media & Society, 24(4), 917–935. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820915357
Tucker, J. A., Guess, A., Barberá, P., Vaccari, C., & Siegel, A. (2021). Social Media, Political Polarization, and Political Disinformation: A Review of the Scientific Literature. Political Science Quarterly, 136(3), 485–511.
Vaccari, C., & Valeriani, A. (2021). Outside the Bubble: Social Media and Political Participation in Western Democracies. Oxford University Press.
Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2019). The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford University Press.
