Analisis Fraud Pentagon Mendeteksi Potensi Financial Statement Fraud Perusahaan IDX30 Bursa Efek Indonesia

Authors

  • Susan Rachmawati Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
  • Andi Martias Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
  • Sudirja Sudirja Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
  • Firstianty Wahyuhening F Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37481/jmh.v5i2.1403

Keywords:

Fraud Pentagon, F-Score, Potential for Fraudulent Financial Statements, Indonesia Stock Exchange

Abstract

This research aims to determine the possibility of financial statement fraud by using Pentagon fraud analysis. Pentagon fraud is a concept that explains the factors that cause someone to commit fraud, namely pressure, opportunity, rationalization, ability, and management. In this research, stress factors are proxied through the use of financial goals and external stress. Opportunity factors are proxied by utilizing industry characteristics and effective monitoring. The rationalization factor is proxied using Changes in Auditors. The competency factor is represented by changes in management use. Finally, proxy the arrogance factor using the number of frequent Key Management images. This study uses the F-score model to see the possibility of false financial reports. The sample for this research is 30 IDX30 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2020 to 2024 that meet certain criteria. The analysis technique used is panel data regression analysis and hypothesis testing using the t-test. The results of this research indicate that the variables financial objectives and management changes are proven to have a significant positive effect on the likelihood of detecting financial statement fraud, however the nature of external pressures and industry variables have a negative impact on the likelihood of detecting financial report fraud. Meanwhile, effective monitoring variables; Replacing auditors and management has no impact on the detection of financial reports that have the potential to be fraudulent.

References

ACFE. (2018). Laporan Kepada Bangsa-Bangsa Studi Global 2018 tentang Penipuan dan Penyalahgunaan Pekerjaan Asia-Pasifik Edisi (Vol. 10).

A Martias, dkk. (2022).The Role of Internal Auditors in Control Self Assesment in The Material Planning Filed of Automotive Company PT Alkha. Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings, 133-140.

Cressey, DR (2019). Uang Orang Lain: Sebuah Studi dalam Psikologi Sosial Embezzlemente. New Jersey: Patterson Smith.

Ardianto, H. (2020). Fraud Triangle, Pemahaman dalam Lingkungan Kerja. Mekari Talenta.

Dechow, PM, Ge, W., Larson, CR, & Sloan, RG. (2019). Memprediksi kesalahan penyajian akuntansi material.Penelitian Akuntansi Kontemporer, 28(1), 17–82. .

Kurnia, A. A., & Anis, I. (2017). Analisis Fraud Pentagon dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dengan Menggunakan Fraud Score Model. Journal of Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XX.

Nurmulina, A., & Sasongko, N. (2017). Analisis Fraud Pentagon dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement. Prospek Dan Tantangan Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa. https://doi.org/ISSN 2460- 0784

Putriasih, K., Herawati, N. N. T., & Wahyuni, M. A. (2016). Analisis Fraud Diamond dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud : Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) Tahun 2013-2015. Akuntansi Program S1, 1(3).

Rezaee, Z., & Riley, R. (2019). Penipuan Laporan Keuangan: Pencegahan dan Deteksi (edisi ke-2). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Richardson, SA, Sloan, RG, Soliman, MT, & Tuna, I. (2020). Keandalan akrual, persistensi pendapatan, dan harga saham. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Ekonomi, 39(3), 437–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.04.005

Rini, V. Y., & Achmad, T. (2012). Analisis Prediksi Potensi Risiko Fraudulent Financial Statement melalui Fraud Score Model. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 1, 1–15.

Romney, MB, & Steinbart, PJ (2012). Sistem Informasi Akuntansi (edisi ke-12). Harlow: Pendidikan Pearson Terbatas.

Septriani, Y., & Handayani, D. (2018). Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dengan Analisis Fraud Pentagon . Jurnal Politeknik Caltex Riau, 11(1), 11–23.

Sihombing, K. S., & Rahardjo, S. N. (2014). Analisis Fraud Diamond Dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud : Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia ( Bei ) Tahun 2010-2012. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 03(02).

Skousen, CJ, Smith, KR, & Wright, CJ (2018). Mendeteksi dan memprediksi penipuan laporan keuangan: efektivitas pelatihan penipuan.

Skousen, CJ, & Twedt, BJ (2019). Penipuan di Pasar Negara Berkembang: Analisis Lintas Negara. Sriyana, J. (2014). Metode Regresi Data Panel (edisi ke-1). Yogyakarta: Ekonesia.

Tessa, C. (2016). Fraudulent Financial reporting: Pengujian Teori Fraud Pentagon pada Sektor Keuangan dan Perbankan di Indonesia.

Widarjono, A. (2015). Statistika Terapan dengan Excell dan SPSS (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.

Wolfe, DT, & Hermanson, DR (2014). Berlian Penipuan: Mempertimbangkan Empat Unsur Penipuan. Jurnal CPA, 12(74), 38–42.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-01

How to Cite

Rachmawati, S., Martias, A., Sudirja, S., & Wahyuhening F, F. (2025). Analisis Fraud Pentagon Mendeteksi Potensi Financial Statement Fraud Perusahaan IDX30 Bursa Efek Indonesia. AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis, 5(2), 691–701. https://doi.org/10.37481/jmh.v5i2.1403