Metode SAW dan TOPSIS dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan: Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37481/jmeb.v3i2.1174Keywords:
SAW, TOPSIS, Decision Support System, Effectiveness, EfficiencyAbstract
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the SAW and TOPSIS methods in decision support systems and identify the latest trends and innovations in their application. The research analyzes various academic sources, including journals and conference papers, that discuss these methods and compare them with other approaches based on criteria such as accuracy, complexity, and ease of implementation. Case studies from different fields are utilized to assess the real-world performance of these methods. The findings indicate that the SAW method is more efficient in computational time and suitable for problems with numerous quantitative criteria, although it is less optimal for criteria with highly varied importance levels. Meanwhile, the TOPSIS method provides higher accuracy in handling diverse criteria and complex data, albeit requiring more time and computational resources. Both methods remain relevant due to innovations that enhance their effectiveness in various decision support system applications.
References
Celikbilek, Y., & Tuysuz, F. (2020). An in-depth review of theory of the TOPSIS method: An experimental analysis. Journal of Management Analytics, 7(2), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2020.1748528
Chakraborty, S. (2022). TOPSIS and Modified TOPSIS: A comparative analysis. Decision Analytics Journal, 2(December 2021), 100021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2021.100021
Cinelli, M., Kadziński, M., Gonzalez, M., & Słowiński, R. (2020). How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy. Omega (United Kingdom), 96, 102261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2020.102261
Dang, T. T., Nguyen, N. A. T., Nguyen, V. T. T., & Dang, L. T. H. (2022). A Two-Stage Multi-Criteria Supplier Selection Model for Sustainable Automotive Supply Chain under Uncertainty. Axioms, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11050228
Daniati, E., & Utama, H. (2021). TOPSIS in Decision-Making Framework Based on Twitter Sentiment Analysis. ICOIACT 2021 - 4th International Conference on Information and Communications Technology: The Role of AI in Health and Social Revolution in Turbulence Era, 268–273. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOIACT53268.2021.9564015
Dobrovolskienė, N., & Pozniak, A. (2021). Simple Additive Weighting versus Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution: which method is better suited for assessing the sustainability of a real estate project. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(4), 180–196. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2021.8.4(10)
Frieyadie, Sukmawati, A. H., & Nurajijah. (2020). Combination of the SAW and TOPSIS Method for Determining the Best Marketplace Recommendations. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1641(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1641/1/012004
Irawan, Y. (2020). Decision Support System for Employee Bonus Determination With Web-Based Simple Additive Weighting (Saw) Method in Pt. Mayatama Solusindo. Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science, 2(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.37385/jaets.v2i1.162
Jayanti, S. D., Budiman, & Yoga, T. P. (2021). Comparison Analysis of the SAW Method and TOPSIS Method in the Decision Support System for Determining Permanent Teachers in SMK Pasundan 2 Banjaran. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1115(1), 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1115/1/012016
Khtatbeh, M. M., Mahomed, A. S. B., Rahman, S. bin A., & Mohamed, R. (2020). The mediating role of procedural justice on the relationship between job analysis and employee performance in Jordan Industrial Estates. Heliyon, 6(10), e04973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04973
Mic, P., & Antmen, Z. F. (2021). A Decision-Making Model Based on TOPSIS, WASPAS, and MULTIMOORA Methods for University Location Selection Problem. SAGE Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211040115
Sarkar, A., Ghosh, A., Karmakar, B., Shaikh, A., & Mondal, S. P. (2020). Application of Fuzzy TOPSIS Algorithm for Selecting Best Family Car. 2020 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application, DASA 2020, 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASA51403.2020.9317175
Shaikh, S. A., Memon, M., & Kim, K. S. (2021). A multi-criteria decision-making approach for ideal business location identification. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11114983
Shekhovtsov, A., & Salabun, W. (2020). A comparative case study of the VIKOR and TOPSIS rankings similarity. Procedia Computer Science, 176(September), 3730–3740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.014
Vafaei, N., Ribeiro, R. A., & Camarinha-Matos, L. M. (2021). Assessing Normalization Techniques for Simple Additive Weighting Method. Procedia Computer Science, 199, 1229–1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.156
Wieckowski, J., & Szyjewski, Z. (2022). Practical Study of Selected Multi-Criteria Methods Comparison. Procedia Computer Science, 207(Kes), 4565–4573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.520
Zarghami, S., & Amiri, M. (2021). A hybrid approach for performance evaluation and ranking of divisional structure organisations. International Journal of Advanced Operations Management, 13(4), 431–458. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijaom.2021.120780
Zhou, J. Y., Zhou, R. J., & Wang, Y. Y. (2020). Neutrosophic Fuzzy SAW Method and It’s Application. The International Journal of Analytical and Experimental Modal Analysis, August, 1149–1154.
